Myanmar is a lower middle-income country. Since the coup d’état overthrew the
democratically elected government in February 2021, international development
cooperation has largely been suspended. The country’s $65 billion GDP accounts
for 1.9% of the regional economic output of Southeast Asia. With a population of
more than 53 million, Myanmar’s GDP per capita is $1,210 — the lowest in the
region.
After a series of shocks, including the Covid-19 pandemic, the military
takeover, internal conflict, and displacement of ethnic populations, Myanmar has
seen a reversal of much of its development
progress in recent
years. Due to the coup, the latest data on the economy is unreliable. The World
Bank estimates that poverty has potentially
doubled,
with about 40% of the population living below the national poverty line in 2022.
The number of internally displaced persons is expected to reach 2.7 million by
the end of 2023.
Myanmar’s Human Development Index ranking is 149th out of 191 countries.
Political violence, economic isolation, corruption, and governance are
considerable constraints on progress. Myanmar ranks 157th out of 180 countries
in Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index for 2022.
From 2015 to 2021, more than 15,000 projects were implemented by 76 development
partners in Myanmar, amounting to a total of more than $17 billion disbursed or
an average of $2.4 billion per year.
Overview of development finance trends
Official development finance in Southeast Asia
Spent, constant 2021 US$
Myanmar
Other recipients
In real terms, overseas development finance (ODF) flows to Myanmar grew from
2015 and peaked in 2020, before halving in 2021 after the coup d’état. Myanmar
received the third-highest amount of ODF in 2020, but this fell to the
sixth-highest in 2021. ODF disbursed to Myanmar averaged $2.4 billion per year,
accounting for around 9% of regional ODF through the period.
There was a significant decline in spent ODF in 2021, with grants, concessional
loans, and semi-concessional loans falling across all major development
partners, including China, Japan, and the Asian Development Bank (ADB). However,
the decline in loans was more significant than the decrease in grants. ODF as a
proportion of GDP trended down prior to 2020, due to Myanmar’s fast-growing
economy, before rising sharply in 2020 after the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Official development finance to Myanmar
Spent, % of GDP, constant 2021 US$
01%2%3%4%5%2015201620172018201920202021
Grants
Loans
Official development finance to Myanmar by transaction type
Constant 2021 US$
03B6B9B12B2015201620172018201920202021
Spent
Committed
Commitments roughly tracked disbursements between 2015 and 2020. In 2021,
however, significant commitments of $7.6 billion were offered by China via
semi-concessional loans for the Mandalay–Kyaukphyu railway project Mya051
and the Kyaukphyu Special Economic Zone (KPSEZ) deep-sea port project. But no
disbursement on these projects has been registered in the period.
Main development partners
Official development finance to Myanmar by partner
Spent, share of total ODF, constant 2021 US$
2015201620172018201920202021020406080100
Japan
China
World Bank
United States
United Kingdom
EU Institutions
Other partners
Myanmar’s major development partners were Japan, China, the World Bank, and the
United States. Japan averaged $613 million disbursed annually, while the next
largest development partner was China, which averaged $319 million. The second
tier of development partners comprised the United States, the United Kingdom, EU
institutions, and the Asian Development Bank, which combined accounted for about
23% of total development financing spent in the country during 2015–21.
Between 2015 and 2021, Japan’s disbursements in Myanmar were mainly focused in
the transport and storage sector (25%) and the industry, mining, and
construction sector (13%). These were infrastructure-focused projects primarily
funded through semi-concessional loans and some smalller grants. In 2018, Japan
became the largest development partner in Myanmar, overtaking China, after ODF
expanded by more than 45% from 2015 levels. The vast majority of Japan’s
projects were financed by the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and
the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Among the most notable were the
Yangon–Mandalay Railway Improvement Project (2014003078 - JICAMY-P4;
2018003027 - JICAMY-P26, 2017003011 - JICAMY-P21), which started in 2017.
Its aim was to improve railway facilities and to enhance transportation
capacity between Yangon and Mandalay. Another major project was JICA’s
Covid-19 Crisis Response Emergency Support Loan 2020003068 - JICAMY-C2 made
in 2020, worth $280 million. The project supported the implementation of the
Covid-19 Economic Relief Plan and focused on promoting investment, trade, and
activity in Myanmar’s financial sector by providing budget support.
Cumulative official development finance to Myanmar by partner, 2015−21
Spent, constant 2021 US$
China’s role in Myanmar’s development
dates back to
1988, when Myanmar was internationally isolated following a coup d’état. China
increased its trade and investment, primarily in infrastructure. China’s
development finance has focused on industry, mining, and construction, with
bilateral oil and gas projects accounting for more than half of total spending
between 2015 and 2021. The agriculture, forestry, and fishing sector and the
energy sector have also received significant funding from China.
China’s development finance has been primarily delivered by the Chinese
government, China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), and the Export–Import
Bank of China. Total Chinese ODF reached $872 million in 2015. However, China’s
ODF to Myanmar has been in steep decline, falling in 2021 in real terms to only
14% of 2015 levels. The largest project is the Myanmar–China Oil Pipeline
Construction Project Mya057, which starts from Maday Island on the western
coast of Myanmar and enters China at Ruili in Yunnan Province. The pipeline runs
771 kilometres in Myanmar and 1,600 kilometres in China, with transmission
capacity of 22 million tons per year. The pipeline is jointly invested and
constructed by CNPC and Myanmar Oil and Gas Enterprise (MOGE), with each holding
a 50.9% and 49.1% stake respectively. Another major program was the Loan for the
Ministry of Cooperatives Mya047-1, which provided $300 million to support
microfinancing for farmers in the country.
The World Bank’s development finance to Myanmar during 2015–21 was mostly
directed towards the energy sector (34%) and the government and civil society
sector (19%). It was delivered primarily through semi-concessional loans, with a
small amount through grants. The National Electrification (P132500) and
Electric Power (P152936) projects accounted for more than one-third of total
World Bank development finance throughout this period.
Cumulative development grants in Myanmar by partners, 2015−21
Spent, constant 2021 US$
Between 2015 and 2021, 82.8% of the development support provided to Myanmar was
concessional in nature, much higher than the regional average of 47%. In 2021,
over 99% of development finance was concessional, which is explained by the
cessation of a significant amount of non-concessional development support in
response to the military takeover.
Official development finance to Myanmar by flow type
% of total ODF spent, constant 2021 US$
2015201620172018201920202021Regional Average (2015–21)020406080100
ODA
OOF
In terms of implementing partners, the central government of Myanmar was the
major recipient of development flows from the international community. However,
this was followed by China National Petroleum Corporation and Myanmar Oil and
Gas Enterprise (MOGE) due to the major pipeline project from Maday Island to
Yunnan Province.
Top implementing channels
Development partners
Cumulated spent (2015–21)
Central Government - Myanmar
Australia; EU Institutions; Food and Agriculture Organisation; France; Germany; Italy; Japan; New Zealand; South Korea; Türkiye; United Kingdom; United States
$3.82B
China National Petroleum Corporation; Myanmar Oil and Gas Enterprise (MOGE)
China
$1.15B
IIST
World Bank
$606M
Donor Country-Based NGO
Australia; EU Institutions; France; Germany; Japan; Luxembourg; New Zealand; South Korea; Sweden; United Kingdom
$501M
United Nations Office for Project Services
Denmark; EU Institutions; Ireland; Japan; Luxembourg; New Zealand; United Kingdom; United States
$384M
Ooredoo Q.P.S.C.
Asian Development Bank
$364M
EXIM Bank of China
China
$339M
World Food Programme
Australia; Central Emergency Response Fund; Denmark; EU Institutions; Japan; Luxembourg; New Zealand; South Korea; Sweden; United Kingdom; United States; WFP
$274M
Ministry of Planning, Finance and Industry (formerly Ministry of Planning and Finance) - Myanmar
Asian Development Bank
$255M
Indian Ministry of External Affairs (MEA)
India
$242M
Sectors
Myanmar vs regional average ODF, per sector
% of total ODF spent, constant 2021 US$
Compared to total ODF provided to other countries in Southeast Asia, ODF to
Myanmar was focused on acute poverty reduction and humanitarian aid rather than
economic development. China’s large investments also pushed industry, mining,
and construction sector flows to above the regional average. Development finance
was well above the regional average in the health, humanitarian aid, and
agriculture, forestry and fishing sectors, while the energy, transport and
storage, and banking and financial services sectors were substantially below the
regional trend.
The government and civil society sector received the largest contribution due to
the provision of general budget support, totalling 18.5% of ODF flows over the
period. This included a $280 million concessional loan from JICA in 2020 to
support economic relief from Covid-19 2020003068 – JICAMY-C2 and two general
budget support loans from the IMF Concessional Trust Funds (2021000056-12;
2020000026) in 2020 and 2021. The health sector received significant funding
for STD prevention and treatment programs that focus on HIV, accounting for the
three largest projects and at least 21% of total development financial flows
within the sector.
ODF for humanitarian aid focused on emergency relief — including shelter, water,
and food for crisis-affected people — accounted for more than 37% of
disbursements in the sector. The largest investment was the Project for
Emergency Food Assistance in Ethnic Areas 2016010005 with a total
disbursement of $20 million financed by Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
The industry, mining, and construction sector received funding above regional
trends due to the joint oil pipeline between China National Petroleum
Corporation and the Myanmar Oil and Gas Enterprise Mya057. Within the sector
during 2015–21, this project accounted for 99% of spending in upstream oil and
gas and 62% of total development finance spending. Its total value was six times
more than the next largest project in the sector. The energy sector, which was
substantially below regional trends in terms of development finance, mainly
focused on the construction of electrification infrastructure in Myanmar,
providing centralised electric power transmission and distribution grids.
Infrastructure vs Human Development financing in Myanmar
Spent, constant 2021 US$
Infrastructure spending trended upwards between 2015 and 2020, with a
particularly large increase in 2020 due to the Nationwide Data Connectivity
Project XM-DAC-46004-52200-001-LN3777, worth a total of $350 million and
funded by the ADB. Human development spending fell from 2016 before rising from
a trough in 2018 to reach a peak in 2020. However, 2021 saw a significant drop
in both infrastructure and human development spending due to the large
withdrawal of development support after the military takeover in February 2021.
For the human development sector, that fall was partially moderated by a
donation of Covid-19 vaccines from China worth $100 million Mya058 in July 2021.
Climate
The Southeast Asia Aid Map uses an adapted version of the Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD’s) climate marking system to sort
projects into three distinct categories: principal, where climate change
mitigation or adaptation is explicitly stated as fundamental to the project;
significant, where climate change mitigation or adaptation is explicitly stated
but not fundamental; and not climate-related, where climate change is not
targeted in any significant way.
Climate development finance in Myanmar
Spent, constant 2021 US$
01B2B3B4B2015201620172018201920202021
Significant
Principal
Not climate related
Total climate financing constituted only 20% of total development disbursements
in Myanmar during 2015–21. “Principal” climate financing constituted just under
4% of total disbursements. It did increase from 2.6% in 2015 to 7% in 2020 but
has since dropped back to 2.4% in 2021 after the military coup. Among the most
notable projects were the ADB’s Greater Mekong Subregion Highway Modernization
Project XM-DAC-46004-47087-003-LN3747, worth $195 million, and the Urgent
Rehabilitation and Upgrade Project 2013003067 - JICAMY-P2 to improve power
supply reliability, which was a $112 million project funded by Japan.
Most of the climate development finance in the country was invested in the
energy sector, notably in electricity grid improvements, hydro-electric power
plants, and energy planning and policy. Total climate development finance was
split roughly between grants and concessional loans, with the top development
partner being Japan by a large margin and then the United Kingdom and the World
Bank.
Climate development finance to Myanmar by partner, 2015−21
Spent, constant 2021 US$
Although Myanmar is considered an aid recipient, Naypyidaw has contributed
annual funding to the ASEAN Coordinating Centre for Humanitarian Assistance on
Disaster Management (MN-AHA), which aims to facilitate cooperation and
coordination among ASEAN countries and with relevant United Nations and
international organisations, in promoting regional collaboration in disaster
management and emergency response.