Vietnam is a lower middle-income country, with ambitions to reach upper
middle-income status by 2035 and high-income status by 2045. Its $366 billion
GDP (2021) accounts for 10.9% of the regional GDP of Southeast Asia. With a
population of more than 97 million, Vietnam’s GDP per capita is $3,756, the
sixth-highest in the region.
Despite remarkable progress in reducing poverty and achieving significant
economic growth since the Doi Moi reforms initiated in 1986, Vietnam still
faces development challenges. Its Human Development Index score places it 115th
out of 191 countries, and 6.7% of the population live below the national poverty
line. Corruption and governance are considerable constraints on progress; Viet
Nam was scored 87th out of 180 countries in Transparency International’s
Corruption Perceptions Index. The World Bank has identified institutional reform
as critical to preventing Vietnam from being caught in the middle-income trap.
Over the 2015–21 period, more than 17,000 projects were implemented by 71
development partners in Vietnam, for a total of more than $35.6 billion or $5
billion a year on average.
Overview of development finance trends
Official development finance in Southeast Asia
Spent, constant 2021 US$
Vietnam
Other recipients
In constant US-dollar terms, official development finance (ODF) flows —
including grants, loans, and other forms of assistance — to Vietnam halved
between 2015 and 2021, although the country is still the second-largest
recipient of ODF in the region. ODF to Vietnam averaged $5 billion per year,
accounting for 18% of the regional ODF during this period.
Most of the decline came from a significant reduction in development loans
signed by the government of Vietnam, notably with Korea and Japan. Annual grant
financing provided by international development partners remained stable,
hovering at around $775 million.
Official development finance to Vietnam
Spent, % of GDP, constant 2021 US$
01%2%3%4%2015201620172018201920202021
Grants
Loans
Official development finance to Vietnam by transaction type
Constant 2021 US$
03B6B9B12B2015201620172018201920202021
Spent
Committed
Over the period analysed, the role and significance of ODF relative to Viet
Nam’s GDP decreased considerably, falling from 2.7% of GDP in 2015 to 0.9% in
2021. This decline can be explained by two factors: a 54% reduction in
development support provided to Vietnam; and a rapid increase in the country’s
GDP as its economy grew.
In Vietnam, commitments were generally higher than actual disbursements over
the 2015–21 period. Among the top five development partners in the country, only
three — South Korea, Japan, and the World Bank — spent more than they committed. The
ratio of disbursements to commitments for the Asian Development Bank (ADB) was
86% of its commitments, while China had a ratio of 32%. Nonetheless, with an 86%
overall ratio, Vietnam sits above the regional average of 64%.
Main development partners
Official development finance to Vietnam by partner
Spent, share of total ODF, constant 2021 US$
2015201620172018201920202021020406080100
South Korea
Japan
World Bank
Asian Development Bank
China
Germany
Other partners
Vietnam’s major development partners were Korea, Japan, and the World Bank,
each averaging $1 billion disbursed annually in the country. Its second tier of
development partners comprised the ADB, China, Germany, and France, which
combined accounted for a quarter of the total development finance flowing to the
country.
Korea’s disbursements in Vietnam were mainly focused in the industry, mining,
and construction sector, as well as in the infrastructure sector, which were
primarily funded through non-concessional loans. In 2015, South Korea was Vietnam’s
leading development partner, but its financing subsequently declined by 79%,
causing Seoul to fall to fourth place among Vietnam’s development partners. The
vast majority of Korea’s projects were financed by the Export–Import Bank of
Korea. Among the most notable were the Lo Te–Rach Soi Highway Construction
Project (2010024966 - VNM-034-2010c), a 51-kilometre road that connects the
city of Can Tho with Kien Giang province in the Mekong Delta. Construction began
in 2016 and the road opened on 13 January 2021. The Vàm Cống Bridge Construction
Project 2010024966 - VNM-034-2010, completed in 2019, created one of the
two largest bridges in Vietnam.
Cumulative official development finance to Vietnam by partner, 2015−21
Spent, constant 2021 US$
South Korea7.64BJapan7.39BWorld Bank6.98BADB4.15BChina2.37BOther donors7.07B
South Korea
Japan
World Bank
ADB
China
Other donors
Japan’s involvement in Vietnam’s development can be traced back to the 1990s,
when it provided significant assistance to help the country rebuild and
modernise its infrastructure after years of conflict. Japanese-supported
development in Vietnam, mostly financed by the Japan International Cooperation
Agency (JICA), peaked in 2016 and has declined steadily since then. Concessional
loans accounted for most of the spending, primarily in the transport and storage
sector. The largest project funded by Japan was the Thái Bình power plant and
transmission lines 2016003050 - JICAVN15-P7, a 600-megawatt coal-fired power
station in Thái Bình province. It entered commercial operation in 2018 after
construction began in 2016.
Development finance from the World Bank to Vietnam over the 2015–21 period was
mostly directed towards infrastructure projects, such as in transport and
storage (21% of total World Bank ODF to Vietnam), water and sanitation (18%),
and energy (17%). The International Development Association (IDA) accounted for
82% of the World Bank’s projects in Vietnam, while 18% were financed through
the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD). Among the
largest projects were the Local Road Asset Management Program 2016027883 - P155086.IDA58100.crs1, which aimed to improve the road and bridge connectivity
for the rural communities of the participating provinces in the country; and the
Transmission Efficiency Project 2014020583 - P131558.IBRD84170.crs1, a
seven-year project concluded in 2021 that sought to improve the technical and
operational performance of National Power Transmission Corporation (NPT).
Concessional loans were the dominant form of World Bank financing.
Cumulative development grants in Vietnam by partners, 2015−21
Spent, constant 2021 US$
United States887MJapan685MGermany622MAustralia477MSouth Korea421MEU Institutions375MOther donors1.93B
United States
Japan
Germany
Australia
South Korea
EU Institutions
Other donors
Cumulative development loans in Vietnam by partners, 2015−21
Spent, constant 2021 US$
South Korea7.21BWorld Bank6.98BJapan6.7BADB4.14BChina2.34BOther donors2.81B
South Korea
World Bank
Japan
ADB
China
Other donors
Overall, 64% of ODF provided to Vietnam was concessional, higher than the
regional average, reflecting Vietnam’s status as a middle-income country.
Official development finance to Vietnam by flow type
% of total ODF spent, constant 2021 US$
2015201620172018201920202021Regional Average (2015–21)020406080100
ODA
OOF
In terms of implementing partners, the central government of Vietnam received
the most development flows from the international community, followed by China
Energy Engineering Corporation, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural
Development of Vietnam, and the State Bank of Vietnam.
Top implementing channels
Development partners
Cumulated spent (2015–21)
Central Government - Vietnam
Australia; Belgium; Canada; EU Institutions; Finland; Food and Agriculture Organisation; France; Germany; Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization; Italy; Japan; Kuwait; New Zealand; Nordic Development Fund; Portugal; Slovak Republic; South Korea; Türkiye; United Kingdom; United States
$9.32B
IIST
World Bank
$2.44B
Export–Import Bank of Korea
South Korea
$630M
China Energy Engineering Corporation
China
$570M
China Chengda Engineering Co. Ltd, Dongfang Electric Corporation, Southwest Electric Power Design Institute, Zhejiang Electric Power Construction Co., Ltd.
China
$558M
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT - Vietnam
Asian Development Bank; Denmark; World Bank
$525M
State Bank of Vietnam
Asian Development Bank
$524M
JAKS Berhad; China Power Engineering Consulting Group
China
$503M
Vietnam Expressway Corporation
Asian Development Bank
$493M
Ministry of Transport, Government of Vietnam - Vietnam
China
$328M
Sectors
Vietnam vs regional average ODF, per sector
% of total ODF spent, constant 2021 US$
ODF to Vietnam was broadly consistent with regional trends in terms of sector
distribution. The transport and storage and energy sectors featured prominently.
However, disbursements in Vietnam in the government and civil society sector
were much lower than the regional average. Where average disbursement in
governance projects was 19% of total ODF in Southeast Asia, it was only 5% in
Vietnam.
Within the transport and storage sector, road transport accounted for more than
half of disbursements, while rail transport was 19%. Japan’s Ho Chi Minh City
Urban Railway Construction Project, funded by a $349 million concessional loan
from the Japanese International Cooperation Agency 2012003054 - JICAVN11-P7, was the largest project in the sector. The project started in 2007
and is ongoing.
In terms of energy, coal-fired electric power plants and electric power
transmission and distribution represented 60% of sector ODF, with the Thang Long
Thermal Power Plant — implemented by China Energy Engineering Corporation over
the 2014–18 period — being the most significant energy project in the country
($519 million).
Infrastructure vs Human Development financing in Vietnam
Spent, constant 2021 US$
01B2B3B4B5B2015201620172018201920202021
Infrastructure
Human Development
Although Vietnam saw a decrease in its total ODF, this occurred mainly in the
infrastructure category; that is, in the communications, energy, transport and
storage and water and sanitation sectors. Investments in the health and
education sectors, which compose human development, remained steady over the
period.
Climate
Climate development finance in Vietnam
Spent, constant 2021 US$
02B4B6B8B2015201620172018201920202021
Significant
Principal
Not climate related
The Southeast Asia Aid Map uses an adapted version of the Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD’s) climate marking system to sort
projects into three distinct categories: principal, where climate change
mitigation or adaptation is explicitly stated as fundamental to the project;
significant, where climate change mitigation or adaptation is explicitly stated
but not fundamental; and not climate-related, where climate change is not
targeted in any significant way.
Although climate development finance constituted a growing proportion of overall
ODF, this essentially reflected the decrease in other ODF disbursed in Vietnam
while climate-related ODF remained stable. The largest project, the Support
Program to Respond to Climate Change 2015003027 - JICAVN-C20, was funded by
a one-off loan in 2015 by Japan’s International Cooperation Agency.
Most climate development finance in Vietnam was invested in the energy sector,
notably in electricity grid improvements and hydro-electric power plants. The
vast majority of projects were funded through loans rather than grants, and the
biggest donor by far was the ADB. Levels of climate development finance stayed
largely steady from 2015 through to 2021, hovering between $1.2 billion and $1.7
billion.
Climate development finance to Vietnam by partner, 2015−21
Spent, constant 2021 US$
Like other countries in the region, Vietnam contributed development assistance
to its neighbours through various channels, including bilateral aid programs,
multilateral initiatives, and regional organisations such as the Association of
Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).
Over the period, Hanoi disbursed almost $7 million for school construction,
notably in Laos —Dakcheung School Inter-SEA014 and Bounea School
Inter-SEA015 — and humanitarian relief, most notably to help the Philippines
address Typhoon Rai’s aftermath.
In the midst of the pandemic, Hanoi provided foreign aid to Laos and Cambodia
to bolster their efforts in combating Covid-19. This aid was in the form of
donations of $2.15 million and $500,000 to Laos and Cambodia, respectively.