NOTE: In the Southeast Asia Aid Map, ‘Southeast Asia, regional’ refers to
the recipient of official development finance (ODF) that is funded and
implemented at a regional or supranational level via multilateral,
intergovernmental, or non-governmental organisations, such as the Association of
Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Importantly, finance flows to ‘Southeast Asia,
regional’ should not be interpreted as the total or sum of the finance that is
provided to individual countries within the region. It does not include finance
that is transferred directly to any national government and, in fact, only
constitutes 2% of the total ODF in the region.
Key development challenges
Although the volume of finance provided at this level is relatively minor, it is
important. It mostly focuses on addressing transnational challenges through
measures such as limiting the spread of infectious diseases, the promotion of
robust civil society networks, and general environmental protection of
cross-border ecosystems such as oceans and forests. ODF in this category
supports the operation of organisations that are critical to regional
cooperation, such as ASEAN, and facilitates the coordination of policy
mechanisms aimed at tackling transnational crime, corruption, and illegal
fishing.
In this sense, although the volumes are modest, finance provided to regional
initiatives is important to Southeast Asia’s economic development.
Overview of development finance trends
Official development finance in Southeast Asia
Spent, constant 2021 US$
Southeast Asia, Regional
Other recipients
ODF to Southeast Asia as a region averaged $637 million annually from 2015 to
2021, amounting to a total of $4.5 billion over the period (constant 2021 US$).
Annual flows increased by 157% between 2018 and 2021, initiated by
multimillion-dollar disbursements for a United Nations anti-malaria project
47045-QSE-M-UNOPS and sustained by Covid-19 support and other health
initiatives.
Official development finance to Southeast Asia, Regional by transaction type
Constant 2021 US$
Official development finance to Southeast Asia, Regional by partner
Spent, share of total ODF, constant 2021 US$
2015201620172018201920202021020406080100
Germany
United States
The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria
United Kingdom
Sweden
EU Institutions
Other partners
The major development partners over the period 2015–21 were Germany (14% of
total ODF), the United States (13%), and The Global Fund to Fight AIDS,
Tuberculosis and Malaria (11%). Closer neighbours Japan and Australia
contributed 5% each. Other European nations such as Sweden (7%), the United
Kingdom (8%), Norway (5%), and Italy (5%) were also significant partners. Of all
the funding, 99% came from traditional development partners.
Cumulative official development finance to Southeast Asia, Regional by partner, 2015−21
Spent, constant 2021 US$
The form of finance provided to Southeast Asia as a region was overwhelmingly
concessional; 92% was grants, and of the minor amount of loans, 44% were
official development assistance (ODA). This can be explained by the high
concentration of traditional development partners, who tend to provide more
concessional finance than non-traditional partners.
ASEAN and its associated bodies are the primary implementing channels for
regional ODF. Other major implementing partners include the German service
provider GIZ, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, various United
Nations agencies, and the Asian Development Bank (ADB).
Cumulative development grants in Southeast Asia, Regional by partners, 2015−21
Spent, constant 2021 US$
Spending in Southeast Asia as a region is largely directed to two sectors:
health; and government and civil society. Those two sectors alone are
responsible for 48% of regional ODF. In the health sector, most projects are
focused on the control of malaria and, more recently, Covid-19. In the
government and civil society sector, the largest portion of finance is directed
to democratic participation and civil society.
Of the 80% of finance spent in the human development sector, much of it is
directed to health, with the most significant development partners being The
Global Fund and the United States. The remaining 20% is spent on infrastructure,
predominantly on water and sanitation by the ADB and Germany.
Infrastructure vs Human Development financing in Southeast Asia, Regional
Spent, constant 2021 US$
0150M300M450M600M2015201620172018201920202021
Human Development
Infrastructure
Climate
The Southeast Asia Aid Map uses an adapted version of the Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD’s) climate marking system to sort
projects into three distinct categories: principal, where climate change
mitigation or adaptation is explicitly stated as fundamental to the project;
significant, where climate change mitigation or adaptation is explicitly stated
but not fundamental; and not climate-related, where climate change is not
targeted in any significant way.
Climate development finance in Southeast Asia, Regional
Spent, constant 2021 US$
0300M600M900M1.2B2015201620172018201920202021
Significant
Principal
Not climate related
From 2015 to 2021, more than $1.6 billion was spent on regional climate
development finance. Principal projects and significant projects accounted for
15% and 20% of total finance flows, respectively. Germany was the primary
development partner concerned with climate development finance, followed by
Sweden and the United States. However, the two largest climate-related projects
were both financed by the ADB: a $93.75-million loan to support smallholder
farmers XM-DAC-46004-54325-001-LN3998 and a $33.3-million loan to support
PET recycling capacity XM-DAC-46004-54333-001-LN4008.
Climate development finance to Southeast Asia, Regional by partner, 2015−21
Spent, constant 2021 US$